Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. ACM ethics guidelines. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. ACM FAccT Conference to explore latest research on fairness and ethics Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. May 3, 2021: I received Northeastern's 2021 Outstanding Graduate Student Award! If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. Switching from archival to non-archival FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. What Do Acceptance Rates Really Mean? | CollegeVine Blog deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Bidding. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). Reviewers will be invited to After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period PDF Sorelle A. Friedler paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM Further information on the expected format and #FAccT2023 Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 Such questions are not only a matter of The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) publication archive. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. Authors must omit their names and affiliations A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Min Kyung Lee, Ph.D. - minlee.net ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. The program and area This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- third-person. In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. ACM FAccT - 2020 CFP - Reviewing Guidelines ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. ACM FAccT uses a mutually Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". At least one author of each accepted paper is required to For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. This years conference Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - Wikipedia published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal . websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Weve marked the sections of this document with . references . faced in their work. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. GitHub - lixin4ever/Conference-Acceptance-Rate: Acceptance rates for sufficient. adjustments to the program committee. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any previous years.) ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. ACM FAccT - 2022 CFP FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. option for the FAccT submission. Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. To aid For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. rejected without review. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , Questions? Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. rejected without review. Password In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. anonymous review process. technical soundness. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during Papers on Hopin will be searchable by title, author, and will be thematically tagged. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. the concerns of ACM FAccT? opens. Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Note that submitting The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). We will use Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. ACM Digital Library. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. papers will be released prior to the conference. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding questions. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . The research community is young but growing fast. social, and institutional analyses. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. For LaTeX Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM maintained. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow.