beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

King builds an effective argument by using imagery, noting the irony associated with the war, and pointing out the contrast between America before the war and America then. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. (2016, Nov 14). His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. This is a logical fact with which no one can argue. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. He shows a strong theme of determination, along with dedication, and perseverance. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). So, what America is doing to other nations like Vietnam also matters. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. Some would be uninterested and some not knowing what to do. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. King also links the issue to the question of Americas integrity. King Jr knew that war creates confusion and that his audiences mind was boggled with questions. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). All rights reserved. Dr. King's purpose is . This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence speech delivered on April 4, 1967, revolved around the growing concern with America's involvement in the Vietnam war. To further strengthen, the credibility of his argument and question the morality behind the war, he says, Since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. It is why he constructs an argument that will help people decide which side to stand with and which to not. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. King proved this partly with the quote, America would never invest the necessary funds in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued (King, Beyond, 9). Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. 663 Words; On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King, Jr., an enormously influential civil rights activist, conveys his indignant and hopeful thoughts regarding the Vietnam War, in his speech "Beyond Vietnam," by utilizing biblical allusion, anaphora, and use of diction. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). Dream like you will live forever, live like you will die today. 2022. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. In order to convince his audience that the civil rights movement in the United States should oppose the Vietnam War, the speaker appealed to their ethos, pathos, and logos. 804-506-0782 1. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. The line, For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent, demonstrates how King uses parallelism. On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. If you use an assignment from StudyCorgi website, it should be referenced accordingly. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. (2022, May 4). Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. Therefore, to remain silent would truly be betrayal. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. He says we were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. King uses this statement to point out the inconsistency with America trying to establish freedom far away before establishing freedom on their own home soil. Apart from drawing a parallel between the situation in Vietnam and America, he shows neither stood to gain from it. Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. How about receiving a customized one? His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. King uses this metaphor to emphasize the treatment of African Americans in America. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies.