pmdg 737 cabin altitude warning pmdg 737 cabin altitude warning

No I think thats different. This is very inconvenient and detracts from the overall impression. In PMDGs forum, Robert S. Randazzo, the head of PMDG, confers the highest accolades on his sound designer, and I would like to echo this praise. Or if I adjust the bank limiter instead of the heading bug? My specs are: Intel Core i5-2400 CPU 3.1GHz, 8 GB RAM, Windows 7 64-bit and nVidia GeForce GTX470 with 2 displays or one display for the 2D panel and a projector for the external view. Once you start to achieve your first successes with this, you should be ready to hazard a step into a real Level D simulator and try your hand at the real thing. The aerodynamic purpose of this is not quite clear to me, but it is definitely beautiful to watch. It issued a directive ordering that airlines check them for faults. For my taste, the NGX feels very good. I was landing at a high elevation airport (10,900 feet) and the cabin altitude warning came on. Frank Schmidts review of the Diamond Katana might have something to do with that I now have an i7 Sandy Bridge processor (2600K) that runs at up to 3.8 GHz. Have fun! Max landing altitude is 8400. OMG this makes no sense, top three switches you could literally be talking about any number of switches lol, Also had this issue, good to have you guys around to help us learn this complex aircraft. WebCabin Altitude: Controllable or Uncontrollable 10,956 views Sep 26, 2020 190 Dislike Share Boeing 737 Pro 1.83K subscribers Following a rapid depressurization, this video shows Let me put it like this: The NGX autopilot makes about the same errors as a real autopilot and to a degree that is definitely justifiable and does not to be corrected. You will find the signature editor on the ACCOUNT tab, about half way down the page. And this is why the better the sound, the better the overall impression. To be sure, the NGX sets new standards in a few areas that all future aircraft will need to be measured by but it also does have its flaws, even if they only marginally impact the overall impression. Though iFly has won the race with PMDG to be the first to release, many enthusiasts see PMDGs product as being far out in front after all, PMDGs developers have already delivered impressive proof of their skill in the shape of other complex airliner simulations. Just two questions: what do T/C and T/D mean in the plan map? A 2D panel is simply more convenient for that. The hydraulic cylinders of the slaps and flaps are also modelled in 3D. We do this in order to keep conversations personal and familiar. Airlines have been told to inspect 2 pressure switches on Boeing 737s over concerns they could fail. WebPMDG 737 very loud and constant beep alarm when about to land. I hope no one is going to claim that they use the VC to carry out the complete initialization of the FMC, for instance. Not entirely sure why, is that a return flight? To me, at least, part of the fun of simming consists of flying different aircraft types. The engines dont look entirely new from the factory, and the numerous official PMDG repaints are also a joy to behold. The Boeing 737 NGX is certainly not an airplane that can be recommended in good faith to an absolute novice. Also set the altitude of the airport your landing at. PMDG should really have deserved this distinction, which unlike the simFlight awards is awarded by the reviewers. By available from Boeing. But this is something I generally dont do after all, I want to assess the sound of the model I bought, not the model I fiddled around with. check out the. Holger: Oski, we really expect an exact systems simulation from PMDG. Before we get down to the meat of the review, we briefly want to characterize the PMDG Boeing 737 NGX in the wider context of the current add-on market. There are a lot of things happening in the flight deck that can cause a warning. In the case of cockpit views, I am of the same mind frame as Captain Oski, I prefer 2D panels and was pleased to hear of the inclusion of a 2D panel but disappointed that some things were left out of it. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I did not find any function that displayed any obvious errors. My solution to this has been the VRInsight MCP combo on one hand and a touch screen on the other. You will become aware of many details you would not previously have paid attention to. But it is also the add-on that has had to contend with the highest level of expectations. You didn't set the bleeds and/or packs correctly after your engine start. Work through that section of the checklist again on your next flight. Hav Did you set your cruise altitude on the overhead? Review : SXAirportDesign El Paso International Airport P3D5, Review : RFscenerybuilding Brussels South Charleroi International Airport P3D5, Review : Pro Flight Trainer PUMA X and Flight Sim Coach experience with MSFS, MLD Scenery LRIA Iasi Announced for MSFS, Configuration of the aircraft from the cockpit without a restart, Crash to desktop (CTD) on some systems (see PMDG support forum). I was a little surprised that the 737 NGX now has one after all. Includes the the 737-900ER in passenger configuration with both blended winglets and split scimitar winglet configurations. Can't figure it out. Once you have internalized the concept, you can conveniently operate the NGX to its full extent without any major investments in home cockpit hardware. Quite Amuse! I have to say, though, that I dont have any real aircraft experience to compare to, nor do I have the time to climb into one of the fixed-based simulators in my vicinity. The investment has been worthwhile; with very high display settings, MyTraffic, ActiveSkyEvolution and REX2 clouds, the PMDG flies absolutely fluidly at a Mega airport with a good 20+x fps; at the gate, frames may dip to 12-15 on occasion. What use is the most detailed systems simulation if I have to click through three sub-panels in critical phases of flight with high workload? For example, this applies to the air conditioning sound and more seriously to all of the altitude callouts including the altitude warning. Stefan: To me, personally, the interaction concept of a panel is one of the topmost quality aspects of an aircraft add on. I use only a sub-woofer and two tweeters all in all, a pretty standard PC sound system. A negative point that I noticed and again this applies to my multi-screen 2D environment is the fact that various sounds drop out when the focus switches from the main screen to one of the auxiliary screens. I suppose a cockpit is anything but a quiet place. After starting engines set the top three switches to auto. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. The aerodynamic purpose of this is not quite clear to me, but it is definitely beautiful to watch. For example, at low speeds it has the same difficulties in holding altitude precisely when rolling into or out of a turn as some of its big colleagues. Check your pressurization panel. You took the time to be here, we want to get to know you. It added: "Addressing these failures requires immediate action.". Honestly speaking I would feel very uncomfortable about this in real life, particularly if you consider that one of the main purposes of a go-around is to regain altitude quickly. Should steel brakes or carbon brakes be simulated? After all, an uh-oh is something no one wants to experience. I really took the system to its extremes here. Has PMDG thought of pilots like you? To date, PMDG has not necessarily been known for eye candy; an accurate rating for the external models of previous years might be solid work. Holger: Frank, who recently wrote the review for the DA-20 Katana, pointed out the cockpit crew animations to me. Doubt PMDG modeled this. Another point that definitely deserves a positive mention: All of the load management passengers, cargo and fuel, including the correct distribution across the aircraft is carried out from the cockpit via the CDU. You can probably tell that many of these questions will not interest most virtual Boeing captains, who follow the motto: Can I use this to recreate my last summer holiday flight or not? But those who have knowledge of the subject matter and know what the different configuration options mean will find great satisfaction in them. Holger: The complexity is of course not restricted to the systems simulation but continues with the visual model. Applying for medicals to start PPL soon. As a user, you dont have total control over all sound levels except, that is, if you have some knowledge of the sound.cfg file and fiddle around with it. The order makes mandatory a recommendation that Boeing issued to customers last month. The FAA said it doesn't have enough information yet to explain why the failure rate of the switches is "unexpectedly high" and recommended that airlines return any failed switches so that the switch manufacturer, which it didn't name, could investigate the issue. Its available on the developers own store and Orbx Central for $28.95 and comes with the following features. Feb. 2018 um 9:58 Ursprnglich geschrieben von No attacking of other commenters (including insulting, threatening, trolling, baiting, flaming), 2. I can imagine that on the B737 the difference in engine sound from the shortest to the longest variant is quite noticeable I know it is like this between the A319 and the A321. Holger: Performance is a good key word. The only weakness I have found in this regard is the way the engine loses thrust when the fuel lever is closed. However, I have to deduct more than a few points for one of my favourite procedures, the automatic go-around. Sound environment built using recordings from a purpose-instrumented airplane recording effort. And this is a good thing after all, there are already more than enough other freeware and payware options for novices .This is not a game, this is a simulation of a working environment. Quite simple: The better is always the enemy of the good. Here, at least, there are no wrong entries, but the procedures themselves are flown very imprecisely. High complexity, good design and great sound do not necessarily guarantee that flying the PMDG will provide hours of fun with lots of ahhhs and ohhhs. By the way, practically all adjustments are made via the Flight Management Computer and take immediate effect without having to restart the simulator. I fly using TrackIR, and I dont need the 2D panel at all. PMDG has currently released the third hotfix for this issue, but some users continue to experience problems. As a result of this, the A pillar in these airplanes is more inclined, and the bulge does not remind me as much of the nose of my former Latin teacher as the one in the PMDG. No discussion about problems you have with an add-on using the outdated cracked version of MSFS (1.19.9.0), 7. Espaol - Latinoamrica (Spanish - Latin America), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7lO0kYwdqo. Who knows, maybe an update will address this. But lets get back to the core topic of complexity for a moment: Do I have to be an expert to fly the 737 NGX within the boundaries of the Normal Procedures? You can also tell it would spread a Fire fast in any crash if ON. Oski: Well, it would be easy to hand out superlatives. No doubt there will always be some room for discussion whether the trim sound, say, is too quiet or whether the spoiler extension on landing sounds quite so or a bit different. Forums. Founder of AVSIM Online. When I browse various forums and seeinexperienced simmers asking questions on the level of what button do I need to press to take off, I do have to say that a certain level of expertise is required. Work through that section of the checklist again on your next flight. And at this point, I again need to make an important digression: As usual, I have read the whole spectrum of assessments in the PMDG forums from too sensitive to too sluggish. After all not all use VC or single monitor. Even a few years ago, flight instructors in airliner flight schools would have shaken their heads at the mere thought. What is essential to me as a lay person is the overall atmosphere, and that is definitely believable. The present 737 interpretation from PMDG, to me, is the climax of this development (for the present?). And of course this entails that you need to obtain the necessary documents and work them through. To what degree the data conversion performed by Navigraph is responsible for this cannot be determined. There is an Alt horn shut-off button its on one of the pressurization panels, if you press that one you will get rid of the alarm sound for the rest of the flight. Is it even possible that this PMDG software can simulate a Boeing 737 realistically? I just muted the game tho and carried on unpressurized . Hardcore simmers will surely be delighted to note that printed manuals are available covering everything from Crew Training to the Quick Reference Handbook. The usability of the FMC on multi-monitor systems is bad to put it mildly. Or if I adjust the bank limiter instead of the heading bug? Where high complexity and exact design meet, even a capable family PC can reach its limits. They were set to 38000ft cruise alt and 150ft landing alt on both occasions. I think I just forgot to turn the L and R recirc fans back on after en